But first we need to set the scene of the poor state of civil rights in 1955 Montgomery, Alabama. As I mentioned in the Martin Luther King posting, segregation was still very much a part of the life of an African American back then. Workplaces, schools, shops, restaurants, bars, toilets - everything was segregated.
Black people were banned entirely from some places that white people went, and where they were allowed, they were segregated to particular areas, which you could be certain would be the most undesirable section. People even had to use different water fountains.
In Montgomery this meant that Jim Crow (a commonly used perjorative term for negro generally used to describe segregation legislation) rules of bus segregation were applied. These stated that the front of the bus was reserved for white people, and blacks were never allowed to sit there.
Black people, who were by far the majority of the bus users, were expected to fill up the bus from the back and if only seats at the front remained, they had to stand rather than sit in them. But if a white person got on, and there was no seat available at the front, then those people in the first black row were required to give up their seats and stand. Generally black people followed the rules, but occasionally someone would refuse, and they would be arrested.
Now when this story is told, it is often assumed that Rosa Parks was just a normal woman, tired after the end of her work day, who just decided there and then that she would not stand when asked. But that is not the case. In fact, when you look at the facts, it seems quite likely that this was a planned protest.
And this was not her first brush with the driver, Blake. Some drivers would make a black passenger pay at the front, then make them get off and reboard at the back door. This had happened to Rosa and the driver, Blake, had then driven off before she could reboard. She had vowed never to use a bus that he was driving again. And yet on this day she did.
Of course the fact that this may have been a planned protest does not make it any less valid. It was not a manufactured situation - she was arrested for failing to comply with segregation laws.
This wasn't the first time someone had been arrested, but this time, the black community decided to do something about it. Jo Ann Robinson, a member of the Women's Political Council (WPC) of Montgomery, put out a leaflet to all of the black community calling for them to boycott the buses on Monday 5 December, when Rosa's case was to be heard.
The newly formed Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA), led by the new Baptist minister in town, one Dr Martin Luther King Junior, was demanding a compromise for the buses. It did not ask for its preferred solution of a complete end to segregation, but instead sought a simple division of the bus, so that whilst a black person may still have to stand if their section was full, even if the white section was empty, they would never again have to give up their seat for a white person.
The Browder v Gayle case was decided on 13 June 1956, when the federal courts ruled the segregation on Alabama buses as unconstitutional. The State appealed, but on 17 December 1956, the Supreme Court upheld the decision, and three days later, ordered the desegregation of Alabama buses.
The boycott ended on the same day.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We like to hear from you too, so please leave us a message here. We are also happy to answer any questions if we can help. Comments are moderated so will not appear straight away and there could be some delay in replying if we are travelling.